The growth and popularity of blockchain technology is at an all-time global high and does not appear to be slowing down anytime soon. Courtesy of the versatility of its use and application, blockchain technology may have a newfound utility in the future management and registration of land transactions in Kenya. This is according to ICT Cabinet Secretary, Joe Mucheru.
So, what is blockchain technology?
A blockchain is a digital database or ledger distributed across a network of computers which is protected by coding the data to prevent editing and removal, and blockchain technology is the underlying application that enables all of this. Importantly, a blockchain records and stores all the transactions that occur within the network, essentially eliminating the need for third parties to confirm the validity of the transactions.
Until recently, blockchain technology was largely utilized and associated with cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin but more and more jurisdictions are slowly opening up to its use in different areas such as financial asset management and in land registration systems.
Blockchain technology and real estate
Property fraud is one of the biggest problems facing developing countries and Kenya is no exception with many Kenyans having fallen victim to fraudulent land dealers. For years, aggrieved citizens voiced their concerns with the government regarding the poor management of the lands registries and in 2016 the Ministry of Lands finally embarked on a digitization exercise of the 57 land registries across the country which have been keeping manual records since 1895. This exercise is ongoing and is aimed at improving the delivery of services through electronic land transactions.
While this effort must be lauded, it came at a period when the developed world appeared to be going one way and Kenya the other. However, the recent announcement by the ICT Cabinet Secretary that blockchain technology will be applied to supplement the digital database is a welcome relief.
Blockchain versus traditional databases
Blockchain’s advantage over traditional databases (such as the one being implemented by the Lands Ministry) are numerous. First, under blockchain, a central database or settlement system maintained by the Land Registry for example, is replaced by multiple copies. This is great because the problem with a centralized system, especially in a country with endemic corruption, is that ill-intentioned bureaucrats often infiltrate and tamper with the system and a digital database is not exempted from such tampering.
In a land transaction utilizing blockchain, multiple copies of a blockchain will be held by any number of interested parties such as owners, potential purchasers and agents. These copies continuously and automatically update their contents via a complex consensus mechanism that means that they are always identical. By using hashes to identify every real estate transaction, proponents argue issues such as who is the legal owner of a property can be remedied.
Secondly, blockchain technology underpins ‘smart contracts’, which are programmable contracts that self-execute when certain conditions are met and offer the possibility that transactions could complete much faster when combined with a blockchain registry. For instance, title to the property could be transferred to the purchaser automatically on receipt of funds and registration delays would be eliminated leading to greater efficiencies and cost saving.
Third, nothing on the blockchain can be changed save with the consensus of the network. Any confirmed transactions on the blockchain cannot be changed, negating fraud.
Lastly, what happens on the blockchain stays on the blockchain. A public blockchain will act as a public ledger meaning that as long as the blockchain remains operative, the data on it will remain accessible.
International application of blockchain
Globally, other countries are already in various stages of exploring blockchain-based land registries:
- In Brazil, as a test case, the government partnered with a blockchain start up to overhaul the land registry at two Brazilian municipalities.
- Sweden has a well-established land registry system and believes blockchain could save the Swedish taxpayer over USD 100 million by speeding up transactions, reducing paperwork and minimizing fraud.
- Republic of Georgia has already agreed to use blockchain to validate all government related property transactions. Since its launch in February 2017, Georgia’s blockchain provider has helped implement property registration and has registered more than 100,000 documents.
- Closer home, Rwanda recently announced that a Swiss cybersecurity company, in partnership with Microsoft, will soon offer support to the Rwandan Government in adopting blockchain technology in the country’s land registries.
Challenges facing the implementation of blockchain
Similar to any novel technology, blockchain and its application also comes with its challenges. Some of the challenges likely to be faced are:
Regulation and governance
Regulations have always struggled to keep up with advances in technology and blockchain is no exception. One of blockchain technology’s challenges is that it reduces oversight. There is thus a strong argument for blockchain applications to work within existing regulatory structures not outside of them.
The recently enacted Computer Misuse and Cybercrimes Act (the “Act”) is however a commendable step in the right direction. It first and foremost acknowledges and defines blockchain as a digitized, decentralized, public ledger of all currency transactions. Additionally, the Act goes on to set up a National Computer and Cyber Crimes Committee, which is tasked with, among other things, advising the government on matters relating to blockchain technology, critical infrastructure, mobile money and trust accounts. However, further regulations on the governance and structure of blockchains will still need to be implemented.
Data security and privacy
Many potential applications of blockchain, such as in land transactions, require smart transactions and contracts to be indisputably linked to known identities and thus raise important questions about privacy and the security of the data stored and accessed on the shared ledger. A key question that will always be raised is who has access to the ledger and how access is controlled. Additionally, even with the very recent passing of the Act, the contentious issue of data security and protection has not been adequately addressed. Nevertheless, the Act states that one of the duties of the National Computer and Cyber Crimes Committee (established under the Act) is to ensure that the right to privacy guaranteed under the Constitution is protected.
The cost of implementing blockchain technology is high. This is firstly due to the fact that we are yet to properly digitize the land registry. Once the digitization is complete, we will then need to set up the infrastructure which will involve acquiring the right software and hardware to support the technology.
The future of blockchain technology in Kenya
The announcement by the ICT Cabinet Secretary on blockchain and land registries, and the setting up of a digital ledger and artificial intelligence taskforce by the ICT Ministry is an encouraging sign that the government is open and willing to adopt blockchain technology.
In the private sector, numerous startups have already begun implementing blockchain in their businesses. In the cryptocurrency sector, numerous companies relying on blockchain technology such as ‘L-Pesa’ and ‘Belrifics Global’ have gone a step further by launching Initial Coin Offerings.
Blockchain technology is a revolutionary tool that will change the way we do business in a lot of different sectors from the land registry to the financial sector and practically every industry that has great data management needs.
Disclaimer: This article has been prepared for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. This information is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, a lawyer-client relationship. Nothing on this article is intended to guaranty, warranty, or predict the outcome of a particular case and should not be construed as such a guaranty, warranty, or prediction. The authors are not responsible for any actions (or lack thereof) taken as a result of relying on or in any way using information contained in this article and in no event shall be liable for any damages resulting from reliance on or use of this information. Readers should take specific advice from a qualified professional when dealing with specific situations.